Button to scroll to the top of the page.


From the College of Natural Sciences
Font size: +

How Electric Fish Were Able to Evolve Electric Organs

How Electric Fish Were Able to Evolve Electric Organs
UT Austin researchers confirmed that the genetic control region they discovered only controls the expression of a sodium channel gene in muscle and no other tissues. In this image, a green fluorescent protein lights up only in trunk muscle in a developing zebrafish embryo. Image credit: Mary Swartz/Johann Eberhart/University of Texas at Austin.

Electric organs help electric fish, such as the electric eel, do all sorts of amazing things: They send and receive signals that are akin to bird songs, helping them to recognize other electric fish by species, sex and even individual. A new study in Science Advances explains how small genetic changes enabled electric fish to evolve electric organs. The finding might also help scientists pinpoint the genetic mutations behind some human diseases.

Evolution took advantage of a quirk of fish genetics to develop electric organs. All fish have duplicate versions of the same gene that produces tiny muscle motors, called sodium channels. To evolve electric organs, electric fish turned off one duplicate of the sodium channel gene in muscles and turned it on in other cells. The tiny motors that typically make muscles contract were repurposed to generate electric signals, and voila! A new organ with some astonishing capabilities was born.

"This is exciting because we can see how a small change in the gene can completely change where it's expressed," said Harold Zakon, professor of neuroscience and integrative biology at The University of Texas at Austin and corresponding author of the study.

In the new paper, researchers from UT Austin and Michigan State University describe discovering a short section of this sodium channel gene—about 20 letters long—that controls whether the gene is expressed in any given cell. They confirmed that in electric fish, this control region is either altered or entirely missing. And that's why one of the two sodium channel genes is turned off in the muscles of electric fish. But the implications go far beyond the evolution of electric fish.

"This control region is in most vertebrates, including humans," Zakon said. "So, the next step in terms of human health would be to examine this region in databases of human genes to see how much variation there is in normal people and whether some deletions or mutations in this region could lead to a lowered expression of sodium channels, which might result in disease."

The study's first author is Sarah LaPotin, a research technician in Zakon's lab at the time of the research and currently a doctoral candidate at the University of Utah. In addition to Zakon, the study's other senior authors are Johann Eberhart, a professor of molecular biosciences at UT Austin, and Jason Gallant, associate professor of integrative biology at Michigan State University.

Zakon said the sodium channel gene had to be turned off in muscle before an electric organ could evolve.

"If they turned on the gene in both muscle and the electric organ, then all the new stuff that was happening to the sodium channels in the electric organ would also be occurring in the muscle," Zakon said. "So, it was important to isolate the expression of the gene to the electric organ, where it could evolve without harming muscle."

There are two groups of electric fish in the world—one in Africa and the other in South America. The researchers discovered that the electric fish in Africa had mutations in the control region, while electric fish in South America lost it entirely. Both groups arrived at the same solution for developing an electric organ—losing expression of a sodium channel gene in muscle—though from two different paths.

"If you rewound the tape of life and hit play, would it play back the same way or would it find new ways forward? Would evolution work the same way over and over again?" said Gallant, who breeds the electric fish from South America that were used in part of the study. "Electric fish let us try to answer that question because they have repeatedly evolved these incredible traits. We swung for the fences in this paper, trying to understand how these sodium channel genes have been repeatedly lost in electric fish. It really was a collaborative effort."

One of the next questions the researchers hope to answer is how the control region evolved to turn on sodium channels in the electric organ.

Funding for this research was provided by the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health.


The researchers began the project by comparing the genomes of many vertebrates and noticing that one short sequence within sodium channel genes was highly conserved across all of them—with the exception of electric fish, where in one duplicate of the gene, it was either missing or altered. This suggested to them that it might have a role in controlling expression of this sodium channel gene.

"When you see the same sequence is conserved across a broad range of species, it gives you a strong hint that these could be important regions," Zakon said.

Next, Sarah LaPotin, a technician in Zakon's lab at the time of the research and first author of the study, collaborated with the lab of Johann Eberhart, professor of molecular biosciences at UT Austin, in using CRISPR-based gene editing to remove, or "knock out," the control region from a fertilized zebrafish egg. They found that the resulting embryo totally lost expression of the sodium channel genes.

The researchers still couldn't be entirely certain that the control region they had identified was the only factor responsible for electric fish turning off expression of a sodium channel gene. It was possible that other molecules in the cells that work with the control region to express the gene, called transcription factors, were also missing in electric fish.

To rule out this possibility, Jason Gallant and his team at Michigan State added to fertilized eggs of South American electric fish a gene sequence that glows green when transcription factors associated with the control region bind to it. As the embryos developed, only muscle cells glowed green. This demonstrated that the transcription factors were still there and that it was only the lack of the control region that led to the loss of expression of sodium channels in electric fish muscles.

One of the next questions the researchers hope to answer is how the control region evolved to turn on sodium channels in the electric organ.

"We only have half of the story, we know how the expression of this gene was turned off in muscle, but we don't yet know what signaled the gene to be expressed in an evolutionarily novel tissue, the electric organ," Zakon said.

Jason McLellan Named Finalist for Blavatnik Nation...
Legacy of Colonialism Influences Science in the Ca...


No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment
Already Registered? Login Here
Saturday, 26 November 2022

Captcha Image