Process

Step 1: Notify Faculty

Departments may choose to conduct the review in a candidate's 5th, 6th, or, in the case of a faculty member whose appointment started in mid-year, 7th semester in rank. The faculty member must be notified of intent to review at least four months in advance of the review.

Step 2: Establish Review Committee

The Department Chair is responsible for establishing a review committee to conduct the review. The review committee must consist of faculty who are of a higher rank than the individual undergoing the review. 

Step 3: Evaluation Report

The review committee is responsible for writing an evaluation report documenting the faculty member's contributions to teaching, research (if applicable), and service during the evaluation period (preceding three years), and must assign an overall review rating of either exceeds, meets, does not meet, or unsatisfactory. Reports are typically no longer than two pages and must include a brief description of the process that was employed, including how the review committee was constituted, what materials were reviewed and the conclusions that were reached, including any recommendations in problem areas. 

Step 4: Submittal

Once the review committee completes the evaluation report, it should be submitted to the Department Chair for their review and comments. The Department Chair is responsible for meeting with the faculty member to discuss the evaluation results as well as present the faculty member with an opportunity to provide a written response, if needed.

The report and any written responses should be submitted by the Department Chair to the Dean's office no later than June 15th. If the candidate is going up for review in their 7th semester in rank, the report should be submitted no later than December 1st of that semester. Please ensure the evaluation report is signed by all members of the review committee as well as the faculty member undergoing review before it's submitted to the Dean's office.

Required Materials

Mid-Probationary Review (Tenure-Track Faculty)

1. Current CV
2. Research and Scholarly Activity 
   • FARs for the previous years in rank
   • All publications since arriving at UT
   • Grant support at UT
   • Graduate student supervision
3. Service - Evidence of department, college, university, or professional service. 
4. Teaching - Please refer to the Teaching Assessment Templates for more information.
   • 1 external evaluation
   • 1 peer assessment
   • At least 1 reflective teaching observations (conducted by the candidate) of colleague's teaching

Third Year Review (Professional Track Faculty)

1. Current CV
2. Teaching - Please refer to the Teaching Assessment Templates for more information.
   • 1 external evaluation
   • 1 peer assessment
   • At least 1 reflective teaching observations (conducted by the candidate) of colleague's teaching
3. Service - Evidence of department, college, university, or professional service. 
4. Research and Scholarly Activity (if applicable)
   • FARs for the previous years in rank
   • All publications since arriving at UT
   • Grant support at UT
   • Graduate student supervision

Timeline

Deadlines for Submitting the Mid-Probationary/Third Year Review

A written report on the mid-probationary review, along with any responses provided by candidate, must be submitted to the Dean's office by June 15th of the candidate’s third year in rank.

If the candidate is going up for review in the 7th semester, the report should be submitted no later than December 1st of that semester.